Swain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swain v. State

985 So. 2d 1127, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8102, 2008 WL 2261509

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 2008

DocketNo. 3D08-856

StatusPublished

This text of 985 So. 2d 1127 (Swain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swain v. State, 985 So. 2d 1127, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8102, 2008 WL 2261509 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The defendant previously raised this issue on appeal. See Swain v. State, 911 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (while successive Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motions are permitted even though the claims could have been raised in previously filed Rule 3.800(a) motions, and there is no time limit for seeking such relief, the law of the case doctrine prevents a litigant from relitigating the same issues previously considered and rejected on the merits and reviewed on appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The defendant previously raised this issue on appeal. See Swain v. State, 911 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (while successive Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motions are permitted even though the claims could have been raised in previously filed Rule 3.800(a) motions, and there is no time limit for seeking such relief, the law of the case doctrine prevents a litigant from relitigating the same issues previously considered and rejected on the merits and reviewed on appeal).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

985 So. 2d 1127, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8102, 2008 WL 2261509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swain-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack