Swain v. Security Live Stock Insurance

43 N.E. 105, 165 Mass. 321, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 253
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 43 N.E. 105 (Swain v. Security Live Stock Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swain v. Security Live Stock Insurance, 43 N.E. 105, 165 Mass. 321, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 253 (Mass. 1896).

Opinion

Allen,. J.

The plaintiffs’ horse was in charge of a trainer

named Cox, and lived twenty hours after Cox knew that it was sick. No notice was given to the defendant corporation until after the horse was dead. This was a plain failure to comply with the requirement of the policy, that, “ if the animal shall become sick or disabled, the insured shall notify the company within fifteen hours.” No fact appeal’s tending to show a waiver by the defendant of this requirement. The clause bears some analogy to the time limit in ordinary policies for proof of loss. The requirement was a valid one. Lohmes v. Insurance Co. of North America, 121 Mass. 439. Harnden v. Milwaukee Mechanics’ Ins. Co. 164 Mass. 382. Davis v. Davis, 49 Maine, 282.

We do not determine or consider whether the fifteen hours would begin to run before knowledge of the horse’s sickness by the plaintiffs or their agent, or whether the notice must actually reach the defendant corporation within the fifteen hours. These questions are suggested by the plaintiffs, but do not arise upon the facts of the case.

Judgment for the defendant corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Harkins
427 S.W.2d 659 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Sheehan v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
186 N.E. 627 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
McCain v. Hartford Live Stock Insurance
130 S.E. 186 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Hartford Live Stock Insurance v. Henning
266 S.W. 912 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Binnie v. Western Live Stock Insurance
213 Ill. App. 75 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
Kentucky Live Stock Insurance v. Stout
194 S.W. 318 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1917)
National Live Stock Insurance v. Bartlow
110 N.E. 224 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Simmons v. National Live Stock Insurance
153 N.W. 696 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)
Smith v. Scottish Union & National Insurance
85 N.E. 841 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.
83 N.E. 398 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Johnson v. Maryland Casualty Co.
60 A. 1009 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1905)
Parker v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
61 N.E. 215 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 N.E. 105, 165 Mass. 321, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swain-v-security-live-stock-insurance-mass-1896.