Swaim v. Swaim

69 S.E.2d 534, 235 N.C. 277, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 380
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 19, 1952·No. 236·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

'WinboRNE, J.

Since the sole error assigned by appellants on this appeal is to the signing of the judgment appearing of record, this is the pivotal question: Did the deed, Exhibit A, from Guthrie C. Pinnix and wife, Lula Pinnix, to Milas A. Swaim and wife, Ella R. Swaim vest in Milas A. Swaim and his wife, Ella R. Swaim, an estate by the entirety in fee simple in and to the 28.5 acre tract of land therein conveyed? The judgment is based upon an affirmative answer to this question. The ruling is in keeping with, and will be upheld upon authority of Artis v. Artis, 228 N.C. 754, 47 S.E. 2d 228, and Pilley v. Smith, 230 N.C. 62, 51 S.E. 2d 923, and the statute G.S. 39-1, which provides that a conveyance of real estate shall be held and construed to be a conveyance in fee “unless such conveyance, in plain and express words shows, or it is plainly intended by the conveyance or some part thereof, that the grantor meant to convey an estate of less dignity.”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swaim v. Swaim, 69 S.E.2d 534, 235 N.C. 277, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 380 (N.C. 1952).

69 S.E.2d 534 (Swaim v. Swaim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of Education
128 S.E.2d 806 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Oxendine v. Lewis
114 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Smith v. Smith
107 S.E.2d 530 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Edwards v. Butler
92 S.E.2d 922 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)