Swafford v. Keaton

113 S.E. 67, 29 Ga. App. 13, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 15
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 24, 1922
Docket13193
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 67 (Swafford v. Keaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swafford v. Keaton, 113 S.E. 67, 29 Ga. App. 13, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

This action was previously before this court on exceptions to the dismissal of the petition on general demurrer. The judgment of the trial court was reversed, and the law governing a suit of this character was formulated in that decision. Swafford v. Keaton, 23 Ga. App. 238 (98 S. E. 122). Subsequently, on the trial, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants. Reid:

1. The jury were authorized to find under the evidence that the defendants were acting in good faith in making and presenting the charges complained of.

2. The case was fairly tried in accordance with the rules previously laid down as the law of the case. The special grounds of the motion are without merit. As was held in the former decision, courts of law must not and cannot seek to disturb, alter, or interfere with judgments rendered in the trial of matters relating to church doctrines or discipline, but the member concerned is bound by the decisions of the tribunal fixed by the organization to which he belongs.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swafford v. Keaton
98 S.E. 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 67, 29 Ga. App. 13, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swafford-v-keaton-gactapp-1922.