S.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.W. v. State

537 So. 2d 679, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 264, 1989 WL 4186

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1989

DocketNo. 87-648

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 679 (S.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.W. v. State, 537 So. 2d 679, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 264, 1989 WL 4186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The single issue raised in this appeal— that the trial court should have suppressed evidence obtained from a juvenile passenger who was ordered out of a vehicle after the vehicle was stopped for minor infractions—was not preserved for review by a motion to suppress. In order to be preserved for review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument must be part of that presentation. Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The single issue raised in this appeal— that the trial court should have suppressed evidence obtained from a juvenile passenger who was ordered out of a vehicle after the vehicle was stopped for minor infractions—was not preserved for review by a motion to suppress. In order to be preserved for review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument must be part of that presentation. Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 679, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 264, 1989 WL 4186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sw-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack