Svrcina v. Nago

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 2020·No. SCEC-20-0000721·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 22-DEC-2020 08:30 AM Dkt. 67 ODMR

SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

EMIL SVRCINA; KARL DICKS; and BANNER FANENE, Plaintiffs,

vs.

SCOTT T. NAGO, in his capacity as Chief Election Officer for the State of Hawai#i; STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF ELECTIONS; and GLEN TAKAHASHI, in his capacity as City Clerk of the City and County of Honolulu, Defendants.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge To#oto#o, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of plaintiffs Emil Svrcina, Karl Dicks, and Banner Fanene’s four motions for reconsideration, filed on December 17, 2020 and December 18, 2020, respectively, the documents submitted in support thereof, and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions for reconsideration are denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 22, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Fa#auuga To#oto#o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Svrcina v. Nago, (haw 2020).

Svrcina v. Nago (Svrcina v. Nago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.