Svoboda v. Svoboda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Svoboda v. Svoboda

289 A.D.2d 410, 734 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12208

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 410 (Svoboda v. Svoboda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Svoboda v. Svoboda, 289 A.D.2d 410, 734 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), dated May 24, 2000, which denied his motion to obtain a free stenographic transcript of the proceeding in order to file objections to an order of the same court (Livrieri, H.E.), dated February 9, 2000, which granted the mother’s application for leave to enter a money judgment in the sum of $10,125, representing arrears in child support.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The father appeals from an order which denied his application to obtain a free stenographic transcript to aid in the filing of objections to the Hearing Examiner’s findings. However, since the order appealed from does not involve some part of the merits of this support proceeding, it is not appealable as of right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [iv]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal. Krausman, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), dated May 24, 2000, which denied his motion to obtain a free stenographic transcript of the proceeding in order to file objections to an order of the same court (Livrieri, H.E.), dated February 9, 2000, which granted the mother’s application for leave to enter a money judgment in the sum of $10,125, representing arrears in child support.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The father appeals from an order which denied his application to obtain a free stenographic transcript to aid in the filing of objections to the Hearing Examiner’s findings. However, since the order appealed from does not involve some part of the merits of this support proceeding, it is not appealable as of right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [iv]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal. Krausman, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 410, 734 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/svoboda-v-svoboda-nyappdiv-2001.