Svendsgaard v. Svendsgaard

190 N.W. 894, 153 Minn. 478, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 833
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 1, 1922
DocketNo. 23,105
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 N.W. 894 (Svendsgaard v. Svendsgaard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Svendsgaard v. Svendsgaard, 190 N.W. 894, 153 Minn. 478, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 833 (Mich. 1922).

Opinion

Dibell, J.

Tbe trial court granted defendant’s motion to dissolve a writ of attacbment issued upon tbe ground of a fraudulent disposition of property. Tbe plaintiff appeals.

Tbe defendant meets tbe affidavit for attacbment by a direct denial. Tbe plaintiff’s showing in opposition does not overcome it as a matter of law; indeed, it would be difficult to sustain an order of tbe trial court refusing to dissolve. It is unnecessary to discuss tbe affidavits. Most of tbe record is matter extraneous to tbe issue arising on tbe motion.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Dam v. Baker
204 N.W. 633 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 N.W. 894, 153 Minn. 478, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/svendsgaard-v-svendsgaard-minn-1922.