Sven Erik Johansson v. Buna I.S.D.

Opinion

14-15-a3319-r;U

1!4 THE C3U3T 0? APPEALS

FOf? THE F7HifJ?£E?-lTH CHJOXClftL OISTf?ICf HOUSTON, TEXAS

syEN eh?s« zjciha^ssofj, appsllfwt sno se, us. ^u FILEDIN bu«a x.s.d., et. al, i4th99.Y£r.OFAPPEALS %,::. ^~...- appellees JUL £*#Z-i5 CHhio ior-M£R A. r'HiflE CLERK Hn Apasal ffss? tho first DudiciQl District Cfe* 3-33p,er County, Tojtaa

APPcLLAWT PRO BE'a RESPONSE TO J?IQTIC£- «¥ -TPC SirSL-RS, 'CH3J&T8PHES A* PSIiSES.,,..3f A P,70 S£ BESP0fiS£ 3Y THIS MOM- OOU.Tf Til AH ALL EG SO jSKOEPB BSI?;Fn (?)

S¥'S?3 SQIK 35Hfl^3S1?J, APPELLANT PRO SS T0S3S 1^6^23g/C.T.TarffeIl/^3 unit 1303 F.M. fifiS Roshsron, Ts. 775-B3 AP-PELLAfiT ?*D SS!s RESPONSE Ti3 £. •NOTICE B¥ THE OLER«9 CHRISTOPHER A, PilXL'E, OF *// i> A P??B S?; R^SPO^SE 3¥ THIS HO»I. CQUP.T TO £«/*•

" ~ ~ ~~ ~ ir^ '""'so *&W*^i*toMMWilU#**i^M»^MijW^ • wm*m**m*t ifolWtw.*w<#™

TO THS HOM. 3U0GS5 OF S8ID G3i5T?T OF APPEALS? ^SfBt^^r ^-e^ COHE's mu, Sy"^l ERIK 30MAWSSf5M, APPELLANT PflO f»E HEREIff, C&M>>^SXgb this hiss i'-saponae to the titled cause, as foiloys;

#1 . Appslicmfc pra-ss ha© not nsselvoii any copy of f'£I7BERT! of th© viarass? docu$?njn?.9 or litlgotionCS) stated irs the Hon, Glerlsa »CA!?<) MSUCE" about AH ALLEGED flH3ER«J 9P.ISF SEltJG FILED, ?50H, AN ALLS^EO PRR SE SS5P0i}S£ TO OWE 3¥ THIS HO?l. COURT OF APPEALS. . . .(?>

#2. Appellant pro-sa HAS ?*Q COSJSEL. . - {PRO S£>,... -50» i t ia highly • unlikely *^«* Appellant pra-se- has filotJ any Anders Brisf m HI3 OWTJ APPEAL-....(?)

#3. HOUEl'Sfl, tllf thn Apaallass havs Filed such a brief, uo do thank . ... tbtss fe* t*ie5,3? p^fff-osaional GtH&sis nf i-?0.fi£5TVs .snd. aaU t5»».t:- *hi* •#«*,. • . Court of Appeals BRDSR A SCySSSAL 19 THE DEFAULT 3UDEMEMT ORDER OF THE HO6!, m&t"; Wimn, 1st 3udleial Olat. Ct, aasspar Co.,Tk., cans no. ^Ba%3 end, OfiBER 5AI9 TITLE AMO 0E£D OF THE MA^O U0fl£STEA3 REPLACED BASvC 1910 THi" LSOAL 5WIERSMIP 8? APPELLANT PRO S5 HSRSIH, and, • should th& Appellees deaiffa to continua this suit, folloy cSue arocsss etf lea and iasa© aervico of notice of Intent to sue and Isvy far thsir mensy/texas , glwinc, tC"M3 Appellant pre as a foijc nopiartisnity to ratain a loan on said property and pay ths back tames uhils Appailani pro-se is incaffceretari, as file banferupcy...,(?) The letar is MOT Appellant pr»~cj-a*s choice, but, if forced to .cfo ss, y?.LL d-o so in osdsr to ossye hlo HorssBtead. . (?) Alternatively, alley Appellant tiaa to rsgain his liharty and 90-cJayo thsreafttar., thoos tssea will be paid.....{?) P30TE TO THE CLERK: Pleass las caa^o spooifis sa to y-BOJI filori on ABDGfiS TSRISf..?. .IM UHQ'g S2HflLP..?..As Apossiliant pro-ss IS A PHO SS APPCLLAWT. ^JG 5U3H 2RI&F UA5 FSLSO [3lV APPELLANT PRO S£. . . , Ai^O A?JPS:LLA?JT PRO SE ?«ftS M8T BSE?I fJ3?IFIE!5 &F A?>5¥ 3UGM CGUISSELO !?APPGl^T«£riTvf. .

• il^Bpsotftflly- s.abR.ittatl,

SV-EM ERIK 3GHAtfSS{SM,,APPSU.AJJT PUB SE T0G3& U65256/C.T.Tsrrell/R3 unit 130Q f.H. S53

S5osh©pon, Tk. 77503

ecimnsATE of service

A 9 3UEN £QSbt 3aHA«SSa?J, APPELLANT PRO SS HEREIN, do state unda? penalty £3 f p-|®s'jurv that I have sant oil parUias in this case a copy of this 3«p§ 8ESPGMSE.--TG THE 14th 8Q?jR? Of APPEALS (TEXAS-HQUST&SKLEftKO NOTICE OF A ipfcb S£ FILING Of aS*5PSP33E TO m ALLEGED ANDEP.3 5SIEF (?.) 0?i§-in®l and ana copy to 14th Ct. of" Apps. One copy to Appalls© oousal5 Llt*:3EBAR3£f? GOafiA^I GLAIR & SAMPSON LLP, an« copy to 1st 3ugL DiPPt. Ct. , Closk, Katfty Kent, .laapas Co, Ts;.. « . » .».sis posited in indigent jaail tivoQ box on S.T*' Tas-^all/RS.^nit an thla 2nd i ^ay mf . u l}\lr n , rrf..2ClS,

SWEK ESSXK 3QHA!J5S0K*APPELLAST »{«l SE