S.V. v. Delano Union Elementary School District

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 4, 2019·No. 1:17-cv-00780·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 S.V., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-780- LJO JLT Litem, CLAUDIA VALENCIA, ) 12 ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE Plaintiff, ) THE ACTION 13 ) v. 14 ) (Doc. 67) DELANO UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ) 15 DISTRICT, et al., ) ) 16 Defendants. )

17 On August 30, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 62 at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the 23 Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: September 3, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.V. v. Delano Union Elementary School District, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

S.V. v. Delano Union Elementary School District (S.V. v. Delano Union Elementary School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)