Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi
This text of Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi (Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KATHEA SUZUKI-LATHAM, AN No. 80486 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. JOHN ANTHONY CODI, AN INDIVIDUAL, Res • ondent. FILED FEB 2 8 retChitlti CLERK çf SUýREME C" BY DEFUrYCLER<
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order granting defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment and judgment in favor of defendant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to have been prematurely filed under NRAP 4(a) because there is a pending motion to reconsider in the district court. This court may dismiss as premature a notice of appeal filed before entry of the written disposition of the last remaining timely motion listed in NRAP 4(a)(4). See AA Prirno Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (explaining when a motion for reconsideration has tolling effect under NRAP 4(a)(4)(C)); NRAP 4(a)(6). We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and accordingly we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
J. Cadish
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Kathea Suzuki-Latharn Ranalli Zaniel Fowler & Moran, LLC/Henderson Eighth District Court Clerk
SUFFIEME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ASO. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Suzuki-Latham Vs. Codi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suzuki-latham-vs-codi-nev-2020.