Suzie Ace v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. D/B/A Murphy Express and Linda Perkins
This text of Suzie Ace v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. D/B/A Murphy Express and Linda Perkins (Suzie Ace v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. D/B/A Murphy Express and Linda Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00086-CV
SUZIE ACE, APPELLANT
V.
MURPHY OIL USA, INC. D/B/A MURPHY EXPRESS AND LINDA PERKINS, APPELLEES
On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2022-CV-0287, Honorable Les Hatch, Presiding
May 16, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Suzie Ace, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s Order
Granting Defendant Murphy Oil USA, Inc. d/b/a Murphy Express’s Traditional Motion for
Summary Judgment. The clerk’s record was due April 15, 2024, but was not filed because
Ace failed to make payment arrangements for the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).
By letter that day, we directed Ace to pay for the clerk’s record by April 25 or the appeal
would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). To date, Ace has neither made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record nor filed a response
explaining the omission.
Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Suzie Ace v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. D/B/A Murphy Express and Linda Perkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suzie-ace-v-murphy-oil-usa-inc-dba-murphy-express-and-linda-perkins-texapp-2024.