Suzette Woods v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00009-CV
SUZETTE WOODS APPELLANT
V.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On April 29, 2013, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as
required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 13, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suzette Woods v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (Suzette Woods v. CitiMortgage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.