SUZANNAH HEIMEL v. SHARON GREGG AND JAY HANLEY

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 6, 2025
DocketA25A0863
StatusPublished

This text of SUZANNAH HEIMEL v. SHARON GREGG AND JAY HANLEY (SUZANNAH HEIMEL v. SHARON GREGG AND JAY HANLEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SUZANNAH HEIMEL v. SHARON GREGG AND JAY HANLEY, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 06, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0863. SUZANNAH HEIMEL v. SHARON GREGG AND JAY HANLEY et al.

In September 2024, Suzannah Heimel filed an action in the superior court, seeking to challenge the eligibility of certain purported Oconee County residents to vote in the November 5, 2024 general election. The defendants filed motions to dismiss, which the trial court granted.1 Heimel then appealed to this Court. The Supreme Court of Georgia “has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over ‘[a]ll cases of election contest.’” Cook v. Bd. of Registrars, 291 Ga. 67, 68 (2) (a) (1) (727 SE2d 478) (2012) (quoting Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (2)). Because the underlying subject matter of this action is an “election contest,” it appears that jurisdiction over this appeal may lie in the Supreme Court. See Cook, 291 Ga. at 71-72 (2) (a) (4) (observing that a pre-election challenge to a voter’s qualifications to vote in a specific election may come within the Supreme Court’s “election contest” jurisdiction). Further, the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction. See Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996).

1 Heimel also filed a motion for an emergency injunction, which the trial court denied. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/06/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Medical Clinic, Inc.
476 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Cook v. BD. OF REGISTRARS OF RANDOLPH CTY.
727 S.E.2d 478 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SUZANNAH HEIMEL v. SHARON GREGG AND JAY HANLEY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suzannah-heimel-v-sharon-gregg-and-jay-hanley-gactapp-2025.