Suydam v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 28, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2264
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 24, 1968
DocketC.D. 3520
StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 28 (Suydam v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suydam v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 28, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2264 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Maletz, Judge:

The protests enumerated in schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

[29]*29IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

That the items marked “A” and initialed ASV (Import Specialist’s Initials) by Anthony S. Valenty (Import Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests and entries enumerated in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, and assessed with duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under either Item 137.90 or Item 737.15, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and claimed dutiable at 16 per cent ad valorem under Item 737.07, TSUS, consist of model line poles in the scale of 1 to 85 or smaller and which in fact are model trackside structures.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the protests enumerated in Schedule “A” be submitted on this stipulation, the same beingdimited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification determined by the collector or district director and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiffs, to be under item 737.07, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as trackside structures, at 16 percent ad valorem.

To the extent indicated, the protests are sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Cust. Ct. 28, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-v-united-states-cusc-1968.