Suydam v. Suydam
216 So. 2d 21
This text of 216 So. 2d 21 (Suydam v. Suydam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Suydam v. Suydam, 216 So. 2d 21 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
Opinion
Affirmed of the authority of Barkley v. Barkley, 314 F.2d 188, 8 A.L.R.3d 562 (5th Cir. 1963); Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 509; § 731.34 Fla. Stat. F.S.A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rufus C. Barkley, Jr., and Joseph G. Barkley, Individually, Etc. v. Emlyn Methvin Spence Barkley, Individually, Etc.
314 F.2d 188 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Reinhardt v. Reinhardt
131 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
216 So. 2d 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-v-suydam-fladistctapp-1968.