Suydam v. Martin

Ohio Supreme Court

Suydam v. Martin

1 Wright 384, 1 Ohio Ch. 384

DecidedAugust 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 384 (Suydam v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suydam v. Martin, 1 Wright 384, 1 Ohio Ch. 384 (Ohio 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

Harper took the deed, with full knowledge-of the sale by Martin to Thompson, and by Thompson to Palmer, and holds the title in reference to those contracts as Martin did. There-is no proof that the complainants have any interest in the matter j. if they have, and would ask a performance of the contract, they 3861 *should tender the purchase money, and bring it into court. There is no money brought in, or in fact offered, and no right to a. decree appears in the complainant.

Leave was asked and given to amend.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

Harper took the deed, with full knowledge-of the sale by Martin to Thompson, and by Thompson to Palmer, and holds the title in reference to those contracts as Martin did. There-is no proof that the complainants have any interest in the matter j. if they have, and would ask a performance of the contract, they 3861 *should tender the purchase money, and bring it into court. There is no money brought in, or in fact offered, and no right to a. decree appears in the complainant.

Leave was asked and given to amend.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 384, 1 Ohio Ch. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-v-martin-ohio-1833.