Suydam v. Kinney
This text of 7 La. Ann. 621 (Suydam v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the court:
A plea of prescription having been filed in this court, and the plaintiff having the right to offer evidence to rebut it, the cause will be remanded for a new trial. C. P. 902.
It is proper to add, that the evidence before ns does not establish the plaintiff’s right to maintain this action. The note upon which the suit is brought, is payable to the order of Suydam, Jackson 8^ Co., and Suydam claims as liquidator of that firm. This capacity is one arising out of contract; and, under the rule laid down in McDonald v. Millaudon, a special denial was not necessary, to put the plaintiff upon proof of his authority to sue as liquidator. 5 L. R. 405.
It is therefore decreed that the judgment be reversed, and that this cause be remanded for a new trial, the-plaintiff to pay the costs of the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 La. Ann. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-v-kinney-la-1852.