Suydam v. Dunton
32 N.Y.S. 333
This text of 32 N.Y.S. 333 (Suydam v. Dunton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Suydam v. Dunton, 32 N.Y.S. 333 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge of this court in favor of the plaintiffs, against the defendant. The findings of facts and conclusions of law are full and satisfactory, and, with the opinion [335]*335of the trial judge, render any enlargement here unnecessary. The judgment should be affirmed, upon the opinion of the court below, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Corvallis & Alsea River R. v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.
163 P. 1173 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Miller v. Southard
162 N.W. 146 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1917)
Anderson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
116 N.Y.S. 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-v-dunton-nysupct-1895.