Suydam v. Dunton
32 N.Y.S. 333
Opinion
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge of this court in favor of the plaintiffs, against the defendant. The findings of facts and conclusions of law are full and satisfactory, and, with the opinion [335]*335of the trial judge, render any enlargement here unnecessary. The judgment should be affirmed, upon the opinion of the court below, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suydam v. Dunton, 32 N.Y.S. 333 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
32 N.Y.S. 333 (Suydam v. Dunton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corvallis & Alsea River R. v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.
163 P. 1173 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Miller v. Southard
162 N.W. 146 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1917)
Anderson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
116 N.Y.S. 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)