Suydam & Jackson v. Westfall

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 50

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 50 (Suydam & Jackson v. Westfall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suydam & Jackson v. Westfall, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 50 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

The Supreme Court adhering to their former decision; on writ of error,

The Court of Errors held, that although Westfall joined as a drawer in the bill as a surety only for the others who procured the bill to be discounted before acceptance for their own benefit; and the drawees, with knowledge of these facts, accepted and paid the bill without funds of any of the drawers in their hands, yet that they were entitled to recover the amount against all the drawers, in an action for money paid to their use.

Judgment of the Supreme Court reversed by 10 to 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-jackson-v-westfall-nycterr-1799.