Suwannee River Cypress Co. v. Jackson

164 So. 835, 122 Fla. 85, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1153
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 So. 835 (Suwannee River Cypress Co. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suwannee River Cypress Co. v. Jackson, 164 So. 835, 122 Fla. 85, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1153 (Fla. 1935).

Opinions

Terrell, J.

In response to the petition of Suwannee River Cypress Company, a Florida corporation, this Court on April 5, 1935, granted an alternative writ of mandamus directed to respondents, but commanding the respondent, George W. Jackson, as Circuit Judge, to vacate and set aside a default and final judgment rendered on the first day of April, A. D. 1935, in the Circuit Court of St. Johns County in favor of respondent, C. L. Arbuthnot, as plaintiff in a certain cause therein pending, and against petitioner, Suwannee River Cypress Company, as defendant in said cause, to recall and stay execution issued thereon and restore said cause upon the docket of said Court for the purpose of considering a plea of privilege appearing on the docket when the default was entered.

The cause now comes on to be heard on motion to quash, and these facts are made to appear. That the judgment by default against which relief is songht, was entered because of failure to plead or demur as the rules require, there was a plea of privilege on the docket when the default was entered, but it was stricken without notice because it was not verified as required by law. The defendant failed to file any statement of facts showing a meritorious defense with its motion to vacate and set aside the default, neither did it offer to go to trial at once upon the issue made.

It was not shown that the remedy by writ of error is inadequate, such being made to appear, the motion to quash should be and is hereby granted.

*87 Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suwannee River Cypress Co. v. Arbuthnot
167 So. 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 835, 122 Fla. 85, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suwannee-river-cypress-co-v-jackson-fla-1935.