Suttrel's Executors v. Dry's Exerc'rs
5 N.C. 94
Opinion
Applications like the present for new trials have always been rejected. Were they to be listened to by the court, they would open a door for much corruption. The rule for a new' trial must therefore be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suttrel's Executors v. Dry's Exerc'rs, 5 N.C. 94 (N.C. 1805).
5 N.C. 94 (Suttrel's Executors v. Dry's Exerc'rs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Selph
234 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. Gunter
230 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Hollingsworth
139 S.E.2d 235 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)