Suttrel's Executors v. Dry's Exerc'rs
5 N.C. 94
This text of 5 N.C. 94 (Suttrel's Executors v. Dry's Exerc'rs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Suttrel's Executors v. Dry's Exerc'rs, 5 N.C. 94 (N.C. 1805).
Opinion
Applications like the present for new trials have always been rejected. Were they to be listened to by the court, they would open a door for much corruption. The rule for a new' trial must therefore be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Selph
234 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. Gunter
230 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Hollingsworth
139 S.E.2d 235 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 N.C. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suttrels-executors-v-drys-exercrs-nc-1805.