Sutton v. Winkler

131 F. App'x 428
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2005·No. No. 04-7274·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dawn Dempsey Sutton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sutton v. Winkler, No. CA-03-847-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22 & June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Winkler, 131 F. App'x 428 (4th Cir. 2005).

131 F. App'x 428 (Sutton v. Winkler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241