Sutton v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Sutton v. United States

162 F.2d 711, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2160

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 14, 1947·No. No. 13196; No. 13197; No. 13231; No. 13232; No. 13263; No. 13264; No. 13265; No. 13283; No. 13284; No. 13285; No. 13286; No. 13287; No. 13288; No. 13289; No. 13290; No. 13291; No. 13292; No. 13293; No. 13294; No. 13295; No. 13296; No. 13297; No. 13298; No. 13303; No. 13304; No. 13324·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On motion of appellee, judgment of District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri affirmed on authority of decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of February 3, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 606, in the cases of Albrecht v. United States (Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Company v. United States; Linnenbringer, et al. v. United States, Pitman, et al., v. United States) 155 F.2d 77; 61 F.Supp. 199, and Oliver v. United States, 155 F.2d 73, 60 F.Supp. 741, holding that the landowners were not entitled to interest in addition to amount under McDowell Option Contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On motion of appellee, judgment of District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri affirmed on authority of decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of February 3, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 606, in the cases of Albrecht v. United States (Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Company v. United States; Linnenbringer, et al. v. United States, Pitman, et al., v. United States) 155 F.2d 77; 61 F.Supp. 199, and Oliver v. United States, 155 F.2d 73, 60 F.Supp. 741, holding that the landowners were not entitled to interest in addition to amount under McDowell Option Contract.

Sutton v. United States, 162 F.2d 711, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2160 (8th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

162 F.2d 711 (Sutton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related