Sutton v. Tennessee

497 U.S. 1031
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 28, 1990
DocketNo. 88-6512; No. 88-7332; No. 88-7444; No. 88-7451; No. 89-5008; No. 89-5016; No. 89-5121; No. 89-5133; No. 89-5146; No. 89-5219; No. 89-5232; No. 89-5265; No. 89-5435; No. 89-5443; No. 89-5470; No. 89-5513; No. 89-5545; No. 89-5616; No. 89-5633; No. 89-5635; No. 89-5704; No. 89-5848; No. 89-5990; No. 89-6298; No. 89-6317; No. 89-6459; No. 89-6461; No. 89-6600; No. 89-6626; No. 89-6778; No. 89-6870; No. 89-6953; No. 89-7080; No. 89-7178; No. 89-7474; No. 89-7512; No. 89-7528
StatusPublished

This text of 497 U.S. 1031 (Sutton v. Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. Tennessee, 497 U.S. 1031 (1990).

Opinions

[1031]*1031Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

C. A. 8th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Idaho;

Super. Ct. Ga., Butts County;

[1032]*1032No. 89-5848. No. 89-5990. No. 89-6298. No. 89-6317. No. 89-6459. No. 89-6461. No. 89-6600. No. 89-6626. No. 89-6778. No. 89-6870. No. 89-6953. No. 89-7080. No. 89-7178. No. 89-7474. No. 89-7512. No. 89-7528.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

C. A. 5th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. Ill;

Ct. App. Md.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.; and

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: No. 88-6512, 761 S. W. 2d 763; No. 88-7332, 127 Ill. 2d 12, 535 N. E. 2d 889; No. 88-7444, 768 S. W. 2d 239; No. 88-7451, 859 F. 2d 575; No. 89-5008, 126 Ill. 2d 424, 535 N. E. 2d 766; No. 89-5133, 160 Ariz. 119, 770 P. 2d 1165; No. 89-5146, 128 Ill. 2d 111, 538 N. E. 2d 428; No. 89-5219, 128 Ill. 2d 1, 538 N. E. 2d 453 and 461; No. 89-5232, 127 Ill. 2d 499, 538 N. E. 2d 500; No. 89-5435, 128 Ill. 2d 388, 539 N. E. 2d 1172; No. 89-5443, 128 Ill. 2d 66, 538 N. E. 2d 481; No. 89-5470, 771 S. W. 2d 387; No. 89-5513, 774 S. W. 2d 908; No. 89-5616, 115 Idaho 1125, 772 P. 2d 1219; No. 89-5635, 771 S. W. 2d 401; No. 89-5848, 779 P. 2d 591; No. 89-5990, 551 So. 2d 461; No. 89-6298, 549 So. 2d 171; No. 89-6317, 129 Ill. 2d 321, 544 N. E. 2d 330; No. 89-6459, 129 Ill. 2d 303, 544 N. E. 2d 276; No. 89-6461, 554 So. 2d 1168; No. 89-6600, 879 F. 2d 140; No. 89-6626, 116 Idaho 860, 781 P. 2d 197; No. 89-6778, 781 S. W. 2d 791; No. 89-6870, 132 Ill. 2d 128, 547 N. E. 2d 124; No. 89-6953, 132 Ill. 2d 235, 547 N. E. 2d 202; No. 89-7080, 883 F. 2d 1503; No. 89-7178, 318 Md. 269, 568 A. 2d 1; No. 89-7474, [1033]*1033890 F. 2d 332; No. 89-7512, 259 Ga. 717, 386 S. E. 2d 316; No. 89-7528, 555 So. 2d 780.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregg v. Georgia
428 U.S. 153 (Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. McCall
770 P.2d 1165 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1989)
Foster v. State
1989 OK CR 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1989)
Isaacs v. State
386 S.E.2d 316 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1989)
McKinney v. State
772 P.2d 1219 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Taylor
771 S.W.2d 387 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Miller
771 S.W.2d 401 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Sutton
761 S.W.2d 763 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Thompson
768 S.W.2d 239 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1989)
Stewart v. State
549 So. 2d 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Ex Parte Siebert
555 So. 2d 780 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Collins v. State
568 A.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
People v. Mahaffey
539 N.E.2d 1172 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Odle
538 N.E.2d 428 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1988)
People v. Young
538 N.E.2d 453 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Flores
538 N.E.2d 481 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
497 U.S. 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-tennessee-scotus-1990.