Sutton v. Sutton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sutton v. Sutton

90 A. 280, 82 N.J. Eq. 648, 12 Buchanan 648, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 348

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 16, 1914·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the-court of chancery will be affirmed, for the reasons given by the learned advisory master.

There has been some criticism in the argument and brief, of certain details of his findings of fact as unsupported by the evidence. We have examined the evidence in the ease and. find no errors of fact in the conclusions of the master that operate in any way to impair the correctness of the result reached by him, or that call for airy special comment on our part.

The award of a counsel fee below is likewise affirmed.

For affirmance—-The Chief-Justice, Swatze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mtnturn, Kalisci-i, Bogbrt, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree of the-court of chancery will be affirmed, for the reasons given by the learned advisory master.

There has been some criticism in the argument and brief, of certain details of his findings of fact as unsupported by the evidence. We have examined the evidence in the ease and. find no errors of fact in the conclusions of the master that operate in any way to impair the correctness of the result reached by him, or that call for airy special comment on our part.

The award of a counsel fee below is likewise affirmed.

For affirmance—-The Chief-Justice, Swatze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mtnturn, Kalisci-i, Bogbrt, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—12. For reversal—None.

Sutton v. Sutton, 90 A. 280, 82 N.J. Eq. 648, 12 Buchanan 648, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 348 (N.J. 1914).

Pincite

90 A. 280 (Sutton v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.