Sutton v. Sutton

197 S.E.2d 9, 18 N.C. App. 480, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1910
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided June 13, 1973·No. 7318DC290·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The correctness of the order appealed from depends on the effect given the judgment of voluntary dismissal with prejudice dated 21 May 1971.

In Collins v. Collins, 18 N.C. App. 45, 50, 196 S.E. 2d 282, 286 (1973), Judge Britt, writing for this court, stated:

“Under the former practice a judgment of voluntary nonsuit terminated the action and no suit was pending thereafter in which the court could make a valid order. 7 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Trial, § 30, p. 317. We think the same rule applies to an action in which a plaintiff takes a voluntary dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(a) (1).”

Regardless of what name we apply to the order dated 21 May 1971, the effect thereof was to terminate the action and when plaintiff’s motion in the cause was made, no action was pending wherein the court could enter a valid order. The order denying the motion is

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Baley concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Sutton, 197 S.E.2d 9, 18 N.C. App. 480, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1910 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

197 S.E.2d 9 (Sutton v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen Schatz Associates, Inc. v. Perry
611 S.E.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Ward v. Taylor
314 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Greene v. Lynch
277 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.
248 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Caroon v. Eubank
226 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)