Sutton v. Sutton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sutton v. Sutton

856 S.W.2d 376, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 969, 1993 WL 227320

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sutton v. Sutton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1626 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1993·No. No. 62735·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from that portion of the dissolution decree awarding general care, custody, and control of the couple’s minor daughter to mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from that portion of the dissolution decree awarding general care, custody, and control of the couple’s minor daughter to mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Sutton v. Sutton, 856 S.W.2d 376, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 969, 1993 WL 227320 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

856 S.W.2d 376 (Sutton v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.