Sutton v. Suncrest Lumber Co.

196 N.C. 820
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 9, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.C. 820 (Sutton v. Suncrest Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 196 N.C. 820 (N.C. 1929).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Even if it be conceded that on the record the jury might well have returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, still the evidence of the plaintiff, taken in its most favorable light, the accepted position on a motion to nonsuit, was such as to require its submission to the twelve.

A careful perusal of the record discloses no material or substantial error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.C. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-suncrest-lumber-co-nc-1929.