Sutton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sutton v. State

1933 OK CR 125, 28 P.2d 1118, 55 Okla. Crim. 153, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 69

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 17, 1933·No. No. A-8579.·Published

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted in the superior court of Seminole county for the crime of murder and convicted by the jury of manslaughter, and his punishment fixed by them at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a, period of four years.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 2Sd day of May, 1933. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted in the superior court of Seminole county for the crime of murder and convicted by the jury of manslaughter, and his punishment fixed by them at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a, period of four years.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 2Sd day of May, 1933. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Sutton v. State, 1933 OK CR 125, 28 P.2d 1118, 55 Okla. Crim. 153, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 69 (Okla. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

1933 OK CR 125 (Sutton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.