Sutton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sutton v. State

182 S.W.3d 715, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 105, 2006 WL 163131

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 2006

DocketED 86186

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 S.W.3d 715 (Sutton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. State, 182 S.W.3d 715, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 105, 2006 WL 163131 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Donnie W. Sutton, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues his counsel was ineffective in failing to inform him prior to his guilty plea that the plea agreement required him to plead guilty to armed criminal action.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Donnie W. Sutton, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues his counsel was ineffective in failing to inform him prior to his guilty plea that the plea agreement required him to plead guilty to armed criminal action.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.W.3d 715, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 105, 2006 WL 163131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack