Sutton v. State

279 S.E.2d 348, 158 Ga. App. 91, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2086
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 20, 1981
Docket61475
StatusPublished

This text of 279 S.E.2d 348 (Sutton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. State, 279 S.E.2d 348, 158 Ga. App. 91, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2086 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of rape. We affirm.

Defendant’s sole enumeration of error is on the general grounds. “The victim’s testimony that the accused had raped her, coupled with medical evidence and testimony concerning the victim’s actions and demeanor following the rape, was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction.” Moore v. State, 151 Ga. App. 100 (1) (258 SE2d 915). The verdict is therefore not subject to attack on the general grounds. See also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Moore v. State
258 S.E.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 S.E.2d 348, 158 Ga. App. 91, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-state-gactapp-1981.