Sutton v. State
This text of 279 S.E.2d 348 (Sutton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction of rape. We affirm.
Defendant’s sole enumeration of error is on the general grounds. “The victim’s testimony that the accused had raped her, coupled with medical evidence and testimony concerning the victim’s actions and demeanor following the rape, was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction.” Moore v. State, 151 Ga. App. 100 (1) (258 SE2d 915). The verdict is therefore not subject to attack on the general grounds. See also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 S.E.2d 348, 158 Ga. App. 91, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-state-gactapp-1981.