Sutton v. State
This text of 91 S.E. 437 (Sutton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only grounds of the motion for a new trial are the general grounds, and exceptions to excerpts from the charge of the court, on the ground that the charge was not warranted by the evidence. The defendant’s statement and the evidence authorized the instructions complained of, and there was evidence that authorized the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 437, 19 Ga. App. 332, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-state-gactapp-1917.