Sutton v. State
This text of 348 So. 2d 626 (Sutton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rufus SUTTON, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant Rufus Sutton appeals an order revoking probation. The record shows that the probation was revoked for the violation of a condition which was not included in the order placing defendant on probation. Therefore, the order must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to reinstate defendant's probation. See Barber v. State, 344 So.2d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 So. 2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.