Sutton v. State

920 So. 2d 624, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sutton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 975 So. 2d 1073
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 23, 2005·No. Nos. SC04-1954 to SC04-1959·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review In re Commitment of Sutton, 884 So.2d 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).1 Upon further consideration of the jurisdictional and merits briefs, and after oral argument in these consolidated cases, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict with any decision of another district court of appeal or of this Court on the same question of law pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and hereby dismiss these consolidated review proceedings.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. State, 920 So. 2d 624, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1341 (Fla. 2005).

920 So. 2d 624 (Sutton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Commitment of Sutton
884 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)