Sutton v. State

131 So. 5, 24 Ala. App. 134, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 286
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1930·No. 4 Div. 740.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

. The proceedings in this case, except as herein noted, appear regular in all respects, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The sentence of the defendant, appellant, to “-days to pay the costs,” etc., is irregular, and cannot stand. Williams v. State, 23 Ala. App. 338, 125 So. 207.

The cause is remanded, for proper sentence as to costs.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; cause re'manded for proper sentence as to costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. State, 131 So. 5, 24 Ala. App. 134, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 286 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

131 So. 5 (Sutton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
125 So. 207 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)