Sutton v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sutton v. State

131 So. 5, 24 Ala. App. 134, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 286

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 25, 1930

Docket4 Div. 740.

StatusPublished

This text of 131 So. 5 (Sutton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. State, 131 So. 5, 24 Ala. App. 134, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 286 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

. The proceedings in this case, except as herein noted, appear regular in all respects, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The sentence of the defendant, appellant, to “-days to pay the costs,” etc., is irregular, and cannot stand. Williams v. State, 23 Ala. App. 338, 125 So. 207.

The cause is remanded, for proper sentence as to costs.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; cause re'manded for proper sentence as to costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI