Sutton v. Sandler
192 N.E.2d 277, 13 N.Y.2d 861
This text of 192 N.E.2d 277 (Sutton v. Sandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sutton v. Sandler, 192 N.E.2d 277, 13 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Motion denied on the ground that the timely appeal to the Court of Appeals automatically bars the granting of a motion for cancellation of a notice of pendency under section 123 of the Civil Practice Act, subject to the bonding exception contained in section 124.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
192 N.E.2d 277, 13 N.Y.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-sandler-ny-1963.