Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board
This text of 702 P.2d 1171 (Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).
Petitioners argue at length about the meaning of the disability retirement allowance statutes, ORS 237.171 et seq. However, under the express findings PERB made, the cancellation of petitioners’ allowances is required by the statutes even as petitioners argue they should be interpreted. They do not challenge the findings.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
702 P.2d 1171, 74 Or. App. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-public-employes-retirement-board-orctapp-1985.