Sutton v. O'Brien
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7711
ROBERT LAMONT SUTTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
TERRY O’BRIEN; BLEDSOE,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L, Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00477-jlk)
Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lamont Sutton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert Lamont Sutton, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Sutton v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00477-jlk (W.D.
Va. Aug. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutton v. O'Brien (Sutton v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.