Sutton v. King ex rel. Hills

228 So. 2d 117
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 1969·No. No. L-381·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed from is affirmed. See Hodges v. Helm, 222 So.2d 418 (Fla.1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. King ex rel. Hills, 228 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

228 So. 2d 117 (Sutton v. King ex rel. Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. Helm
222 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)