Sutton v. Kassapides

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sutton v. Kassapides

73 A.D.3d 1021, 900 N.Y.S.2d 687

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2010·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated February 18, 2009, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant Elias Kassapides, and for a new trial.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the lav/ and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the jury verdict is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial before a different Justice.

The plaintiff was deprived of a fair trial in this medical malpractice action as a result of the cumulative effect of the [1022] improper conduct of the trial court, both during cross-examination and in its charge to the jury (see Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v Mohammed, 14 AD3d 710 [2005]; Ougourlian v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 5 AD3d 644, 645 [2004]; Perkins v New York Racing Assn., 51 AD2d 585, 586 [1976]). In addition, the trial court erred in giving an “error in judgment” charge (see Nestorowich v Ricotta, 97 NY2d 393, 399 [2002]; PJI 2:150). There was no evidence that the defendant surgeon, Elias Kassapides, had to consider and choose among medically acceptable alternatives regarding the treatment of the plaintiff (see Nestorowich v Ricotta, 97 NY2d at 399-400; Rospierski v Haar, 59 AD3d 1048, 1049 [2009]; Vanderpool v Adirondack Neurosurgical Specialists, P.C., 45 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2007]; Martin v Lattimore Rd. Surgicenter, 281 AD2d 866 [2001]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial before a different Justice. Fisher, J.P., Balkin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated February 18, 2009, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant Elias Kassapides, and for a new trial.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the lav/ and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the jury verdict is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial before a different Justice.

The plaintiff was deprived of a fair trial in this medical malpractice action as a result of the cumulative effect of the [1022] improper conduct of the trial court, both during cross-examination and in its charge to the jury (see Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v Mohammed, 14 AD3d 710 [2005]; Ougourlian v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 5 AD3d 644, 645 [2004]; Perkins v New York Racing Assn., 51 AD2d 585, 586 [1976]). In addition, the trial court erred in giving an “error in judgment” charge (see Nestorowich v Ricotta, 97 NY2d 393, 399 [2002]; PJI 2:150). There was no evidence that the defendant surgeon, Elias Kassapides, had to consider and choose among medically acceptable alternatives regarding the treatment of the plaintiff (see Nestorowich v Ricotta, 97 NY2d at 399-400; Rospierski v Haar, 59 AD3d 1048, 1049 [2009]; Vanderpool v Adirondack Neurosurgical Specialists, P.C., 45 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2007]; Martin v Lattimore Rd. Surgicenter, 281 AD2d 866 [2001]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial before a different Justice. Fisher, J.P., Balkin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Sutton v. Kassapides, 73 A.D.3d 1021, 900 N.Y.S.2d 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

73 A.D.3d 1021 (Sutton v. Kassapides) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related