Sutton v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sutton v. Hobbs

112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 401, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 88

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 13, 1922

DocketNo. 2771

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 363 (Sutton v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. Hobbs, 112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 401, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 88 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The assignment of error on the admission in evidence of certain deeds, over objection that the description of the land in the deeds “ does not embrace the land in controversy,” is insufficient, neither the description in the deeds nor the substance thereof being set out in connection with the assignment of error.

2. There was evidence to authorize the charges of the court complained of, relative to the law of prescription.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI