Sutton v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sutton v. Hobbs

112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 401, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 88

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 13, 1922·No. No. 2771·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The assignment of error on the admission in evidence of certain deeds, over objection that the description of the land in the deeds “ does not embrace the land in controversy,” is insufficient, neither the description in the deeds nor the substance thereof being set out in connection with the assignment of error.

2. There was evidence to authorize the charges of the court complained of, relative to the law of prescription.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

1. The assignment of error on the admission in evidence of certain deeds, over objection that the description of the land in the deeds “ does not embrace the land in controversy,” is insufficient, neither the description in the deeds nor the substance thereof being set out in connection with the assignment of error.

2. There was evidence to authorize the charges of the court complained of, relative to the law of prescription.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Sutton v. Hobbs, 112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 401, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 88 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

112 S.E. 363 (Sutton v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.