Sutton v. Hines Bros. Lumber

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Sutton v. Hines Bros. Lumber

197 N.C. 38

DecidedApril 10, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 197 N.C. 38 (Sutton v. Hines Bros. Lumber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. Hines Bros. Lumber, 197 N.C. 38 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

We see no evidence in the record tending to establish the claim of the plaintiff. It appears that the plaintiff and Grady were confused about the division of the extension money through no fault of defendant. While there is evidence of a demand, it does not appear that the demand was made upon the agent having the matter in charge for the defendant. Upon the entire record it appears to us that the trial judge was correct in his ruling.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oubiam.

We see no evidence in the record tending to establish the claim of the plaintiff. It appears that the plaintiff and Grady were confused about the division of the extension money through no fault of defendant. While there is evidence of a demand, it does not appear that the demand was made upon the agent having the matter in charge for the defendant. Upon the entire record it appears to us that the trial judge was correct in his ruling.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 N.C. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-hines-bros-lumber-nc-1929.