Sutton v. Franklin Fire Insurance

184 S.E. 821, 209 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 8, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 S.E. 821 (Sutton v. Franklin Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. Franklin Fire Insurance, 184 S.E. 821, 209 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 361 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The principal matter debated on brief, to wit, the alleged invalidity of defendant appellee’s policy, Johnson v. Ins. Co., 201 N. C., 362, 160 S. E., 454, is not presented by the record. It may be raised by answer.

The demurrer admits facts well pleaded, Oliver v. Blood, Comr., ante, 291; Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388, 163 S. E., 119, and it would seem that upon the facts alleged, nothing else appearing, the demurrer should have been overruled. Ramsey v. Furniture Co., ante, 165.

By demurring to the merits, the “St. Paul” put itself in court. Motor Co. v. Reaves, 184 N. C., 260, 114 S. E., 175.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Fireman'S Fund Indemnity Co.
100 P.2d 364 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Barbee v. Board of Commissioners
188 S.E. 314 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 S.E. 821, 209 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-franklin-fire-insurance-nc-1936.