Sutton v. Franklin Fire Insurance

184 S.E. 821, 209 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 361
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 8, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The principal matter debated on brief, to wit, the alleged invalidity of defendant appellee’s policy, Johnson v. Ins. Co., 201 N. C., 362, 160 S. E., 454, is not presented by the record. It may be raised by answer.

The demurrer admits facts well pleaded, Oliver v. Blood, Comr., ante, 291; Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388, 163 S. E., 119, and it would seem that upon the facts alleged, nothing else appearing, the demurrer should have been overruled. Ramsey v. Furniture Co., ante, 165.

By demurring to the merits, the “St. Paul” put itself in court. Motor Co. v. Reaves, 184 N. C., 260, 114 S. E., 175.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Franklin Fire Insurance, 184 S.E. 821, 209 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 361 (N.C. 1936).

184 S.E. 821 (Sutton v. Franklin Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Fireman'S Fund Indemnity Co.
100 P.2d 364 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Barbee v. Board of Commissioners
188 S.E. 314 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)