Sutton v. Diane

737 N.W.2d 762, 480 Mich. 868
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 12, 2007·No. 133763·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

737 N.W.2d 762 (2007)

Karen SUTTON, Next Friend of Minor J., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIANE J., Defendant-Appellee, and
John Doe, Defendant.

Docket No. 133763. COA No. 273519.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 12, 2007.

The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Diane, 737 N.W.2d 762, 480 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2007).

737 N.W.2d 762 (Sutton v. Diane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. RAMSEY HOLDING, LLC
737 N.W.2d 762 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)