Sutton v. Diane
737 N.W.2d 762, 480 Mich. 868
This text of 737 N.W.2d 762 (Sutton v. Diane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sutton v. Diane, 737 N.W.2d 762, 480 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Karen SUTTON, Next Friend of Minor J., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIANE J., Defendant-Appellee, and
John Doe, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Russell v. RAMSEY HOLDING, LLC
737 N.W.2d 762 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 N.W.2d 762, 480 Mich. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-diane-mich-2007.