Sutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

55 A.3d 1055, 618 Pa. 172, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2616
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 9, 2012
DocketNo. 151 EM 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.3d 1055 (Sutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 55 A.3d 1055, 618 Pa. 172, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2616 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, the Application for an Immediate Hearing, the Application for Stay, and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Protho-notary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.3d 1055, 618 Pa. 172, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-court-of-common-pleas-of-philadelphia-county-pa-2012.