Sutton v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sutton v. Coombe

238 A.D.2d 647, 656 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 647 (Sutton v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 647, 656 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered March 29, 1996 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

[648]*648The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that respondents are not submitting a brief and he requests that this appeal be dismissed as moot inasmuch as the determination under review has been administratively reversed and ex-pungement has been directed. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the appeal is moot (see generally, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered March 29, 1996 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

[648]*648The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that respondents are not submitting a brief and he requests that this appeal be dismissed as moot inasmuch as the determination under review has been administratively reversed and ex-pungement has been directed. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the appeal is moot (see generally, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 647, 656 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack