Sutton v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 101, 1924 BTA LEXIS 244
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedNovember 28, 1924
DocketDocket No. 306.
StatusPublished

This text of 1 B.T.A. 101 (Sutton v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 101, 1924 BTA LEXIS 244 (bta 1924).

Opinion

OPINION.

James:

The taxpayer is premature in the filing of his petition. It appears that he has been notified merely of one of the steps which precede the determination of the Commissioner that a deficiency in tax exists. On the face of the petition it appears that no deficiency in tax has since the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1924 been determined by the Commissioner. Therefore, the taxpayer has not stated one of the facts essential to an appeal. Such a deficiency may never be determined. When a deficiency is determined, the taxpayer will receive the statutory 60-day notice of such determination, and upon that notice he may at that time petition this Board to hear and determine his tax liability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Sutton
1 B.T.A. 101 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 B.T.A. 101, 1924 BTA LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-commissioner-bta-1924.