Sutton v. Champion

129 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 569, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 281
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 18, 1925·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenci-iard, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Champion, 129 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 569, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 281 (N.J. 1925).

129 A. 923 (Sutton v. Champion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.