Sutton v. Capetanidis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sutton v. Capetanidis

97 So. 2d 200

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 3, 1957

DocketNo. 57-147

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 So. 2d 200 (Sutton v. Capetanidis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. Capetanidis, 97 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The main issue raised by this appeal is the validity of a release executed by the appellee. The record in this cause has been carefully examined and arguments at the bar of this court have been considered. We feel that the issue raised in this case is controlled by the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in De Witt v. Miami Transit Company, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 898, and that upon said authority the cause should be reversed. No useful purpose would be served by delineation of the facts and law in this cause as the aforementioned opinion brings to date all the known authorities on this question. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed with directions to the lower court to enter judgment for the appellant.

Reversed with directions.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The main issue raised by this appeal is the validity of a release executed by the appellee. The record in this cause has been carefully examined and arguments at the bar of this court have been considered. We feel that the issue raised in this case is controlled by the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in De Witt v. Miami Transit Company, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 898, and that upon said authority the cause should be reversed. No useful purpose would be served by delineation of the facts and law in this cause as the aforementioned opinion brings to date all the known authorities on this question. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed with directions to the lower court to enter judgment for the appellant.

Reversed with directions.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 2d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-capetanidis-fladistctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack